So-Called ‘Fact Checkers’ Malfunction on Weepy Obama’s Gun Lies

Posted by on Jan 06, 2016 at 7:46 am
obamacrying2

You knew one thing was sure to happen after Obama’s lame crying stung Tuesday and that would be the alleged “fact checkers” would be totally in the tank for Weepy McCryerson. Sure enough, they were.

Maybe we should ban the Internet.

Who know, Obama would probably cry if they acknowledge what a lying scumbag he was.


Meanwhile, the Washington Post’s alleged “Fact Checker” doesn’t have the heart to point out the obvious, so he gives Obama only two of a possible four Pinocchios. So he’s half lying, or something.

We agree that Obama’s language is slippery and could be confusing to the average person who doesn’t know anything about FFLs and interstate requirements. There is nothing unique about the Internet; the laws governing private transactions and interstate sales are exactly the same. It’s the same as offering to sell a gun on a bulletin board, except the bulletin board is significantly larger. The Internet, and eletronic payment systems such as PayPal and Bitcoin, have certainly facilitated transactions that in the past would have been more difficult to arrange.

Obama erred in saying the rules are different for Internet sellers. They face the same rules as other sellers — rules that the administration now says it will enforce better.

Oh, so if we only enforced already existing laws, then there’d have been no need for the staged weeping. Got it, champ. To give you an idea how idiotic this guy is, he fell for a parody site last night:


He later tries to pretend he knew that all along. Sure you did:

Tags: , , , ,

2 Responses to “So-Called ‘Fact Checkers’ Malfunction on Weepy Obama’s Gun Lies”

  1. drjohn on 6/06/16 at 8:52 am

    This is the same pathetic Politifact that stood by Obama’s “You can keep your doctor and your plan” for years.

    Idiots

  2. fun with rheotrical questions on 6/06/16 at 11:00 am

    No tears for Kate Steinle, Brian A. Terry, Sara Mutschlechner?