Shocker: Washington Post Fact Checker Gives Grandma Four Pinocchios For Shamelessly Lying About Her Illegal Emails

Posted by on Aug 01, 2016 at 7:26 am
hill39

Let’s be honest, you could give this vile hag four Pinocchios every day from now until the day she drops dead. Actually, it would be newsworthy if she ever told the truth about anything.

In her response to Wallace, Clinton at one point appeared to deflect responsibility to her aides: “I relied on and had every reason to rely on the judgments of the professionals with whom I worked. And so, in retrospect, maybe some people are saying, well, among those 300 people, they made the wrong call.”

Testifying before Congress, Comey said it was possible Clinton was not “technically sophisticated” enough to understand what the classified markings meant. But he said a government official should be attentive to such a marking.

As we have seen repeatedly in Clinton’s explanations of the email controversy, she relies on excessively technical and legalistic answers to explain her actions. While Comey did say there was no evidence she lied to the FBI, that is not the same as saying she told the truth to the American public — which was the point of Wallace’s question. Comey has repeatedly not taken a stand on her public statements.

And although Comey did say many emails were retroactively classified, he also said that there were some emails that were already classified that should not have been sent on an unclassified, private server. That’s the uncomfortable truth that Clinton has trouble admitting.

Four Pinocchios

(About our rating scale)

Now, does anyone in the media ever ask her about this?

Tags: , , , ,

One Response to “Shocker: Washington Post Fact Checker Gives Grandma Four Pinocchios For Shamelessly Lying About Her Illegal Emails”

  1. no talking when Hillary is speaking peasant on 1/01/16 at 9:43 am

    The Washington Compost did that? No way.
    I better look out to see if any flying pigs are out today.