Illegal Alien Murders Woman in ‘Sanctuary City’ of San Francisco, White House Blames Republicans

Posted by on Jul 07, 2015 at 6:31 am
lopezsanchez

Quite obviously the first reaction to such a brutal murder is to play politics while blaming others for playing politics.

The White House on Monday defended its immigration policies and blasted Republicans following the killing of a San Francisco woman — allegedly by an illegal immigrant.

When asked if the case was a failure of the administration’s enforcement policies, White House press secretary Josh Earnest chided Republicans for blocking a bipartisan immigration bill that would have boosted funding for border security.

“I recognize that people want to play politics with this,” Earnest said. “The fact is the president has done everything within his power to make sure that we’re focusing our law enforcement resources on criminals and those who pose a threat to public safety.”

Sure he is, which explains why a guy deported five times was still in the country murdering people.

Kathryn Steinle, 32, was shot and killed Wednesday at a popular tourist destination in San Francisco. The suspect, Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez, had multiple felony convictions and had been deported to Mexico five times. 

Earnest faulted the “political efforts of Republicans” for blocking “the kind of investment that we would like to make in securing our border and keeping our communities safe.”

The spokesman refused to comment on the details of the case, but he pointed to Obama’s executive actions on immigration launched last fall, which instructed the Department of Homeland Security to prioritize the deportation of people who are considered “public safety threats.”

“We have started to make changes in terms of structuring and staffing … to ensure that our law enforcement efforts are focused on felons and not on families,” he said. “These efforts would be significantly augmented had Republicans not blocked common-sense immigration reform.”

Federal authorities have suggested San Francisco bares responsibility for the fact that Lopez-Sanchez was still on the street. U.S. Customs and Immigration Enforcement (ICE) turned him over to San Francisco authorities in March on a drug warrant.

But he was released in April after the charges were dropped, and local law enforcement did not honor federal officials’ request to be notified when he was freed.

“We’re not asking local law enforcement to do our job,” ICE spokeswoman Gillian Christensen said, according to Fox News. “All we’re asking is that they notify us when a serious foreign national criminal offender is being released to the street so we can arrange to take custody.”

San Francisco is a “sanctuary city” that does not cooperate with federal authorities in enforcing immigration laws.

So this piece of human debris is shielded in a liberal city in a liberal state aided and abetted by the Obama administration, and it’s the GOP’s fault. Makes sense.

Tags: ,

5 Responses to “Illegal Alien Murders Woman in ‘Sanctuary City’ of San Francisco, White House Blames Republicans”

  1. rebuilding Babel on 7/07/15 at 9:33 am

    The dreamer said he found the gun wrapped in a shirt under a bench and was going to shoot at sea lions when the gun went off three times in rapid succession and hit the innocent bystander.
    He also has some ocean front property in Nebraska for sale.

  2. Gregory of Yardale on 7/07/15 at 10:53 am

    The elites who support mass illegal immigration don’t have to worry about their kids losing jobs to illegals, their gated communities being hit by gang violence, or losing college slots to illegal immigrant affirmative action.

    Those are middle class problems. The elites DGAF.

  3. pj on 7/07/15 at 11:18 am

    This killer said in an interview that he came to SF specifically because he knew it was a sanctuary city.

    Take that, Obama.

    And in L.A. another lovely young woman was shot to death for no apparent reason by a youth. He was not white or conservative, or the articles would have mentioned that.

  4. NYC Parent on 7/07/15 at 3:06 pm

    Will someone cogently explain to me how Arizona, seeking to enforce existing immigration law at the State level, impermissibly interefered with “pre empted” federal law — while localities that purport to nullify federal immigration law have not?