What Difference Does It Make? State Department Knew Benghazi Was a Terror Attack Within 25 Minutes

Posted by on Sep 03, 2013 at 10:07 am

What difference does it make? It’s a huge difference, especially since Obama and Hillary Clinton knew full well the attack on our compound in Benghazi was a terrorist attack from the get-go. Yet nearly a year after this terror attack we still have no answers as to where Obama was that night and Clinton brazenly lied for weeks afterward, even lying to the faces of the families when the bodies were returned.

Two weeks after the attack Obama stood up before the UN and lied to the world about a YouTube video nobody had even seen.  But they knew from the outset.

Just minutes after 35 jihadists crashed through the U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya nearly one year ago, the facility got word to the State Department, FBI and Pentagon that terrorists were attacking, according to a forthcoming book that provides the fullest review of the assault to date.

In “Under Fire, the Untold Story of the Attack in Benghazi,” it is revealed that an unidentified security official in the Benghazi compound protecting Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens messaged the U.S. embassy in Tripoli: “Benghazi under fire, terrorist attack.” Stevens and three others died that night.

Twenty-five minutes after it began, the operation center at State received an electronic cable announcing the attack, according to authors Fred Burton, a former State Diplomatic Security agent and Samuel Katz, an author and expert on international special operations and counterterrorism.

Their findings in Under Fire, based on exclusive interviews of those in the battle, refute days of claims by the administration that the attack was sparked by Muslim anger at a U.S.-made anti-Muslim film, and raise new questions as President Obama eyes military action in Syria that U.S. diplomatic posts in the region are properly protected.

The authors note that at the time of the attack in Benghazi there were riots against U.S. embassies in Cairo, Tunis and elsewhere related to the film, “Innocence of Muslims.” That could have been the cause of initial confusion about the attackers, but the eyewitness accounts by State and CIA agents in the battle–backed by live video feeds from drones–should have erased any doubt.

“Benghazi was a malignant symptom,” they wrote, “of a weakened and crippled al Qaeda seeking new battlefields.” They added that the September 11, 2012 attack, exactly 11 years after after al Qaeda’s assault on America, was “to be an opening salvo of a new jihad on the African continent.”

Also revealed for the first time: On her last day as secretary of State, Hillary Clinton summoned four of the five Diplomatic Security agents involved in the Benghazi attack to present them with State’s “Award for Heroism.”

An innocent man spent nearly a year in jail as part of this coverup. Yet nobody seems to care.

Tags: , , ,

Comments are closed.