Queen Hillary Raps Benghazi Critics, Says They Don’t Live in “Evidence-Based World”

Posted by on Feb 01, 2013 at 8:31 am

The balls on this woman. For months she avoided testifying about her role in the Benghazi disaster and now she has the temerity to criticize people for questioning her incompetence.

Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton is leaving office with a slap at critics of the Obama administration’s handling of the September attack on a U.S. diplomatic mission in Libya. She told The Associated Press that critics of the administration’s handling of the attack don’t live in an “evidence-based world” and their refusal to “accept the facts” is unfortunate and regrettable for the political system.

Accept the facts? We don’t even have the facts, for crying out loud.

I was so unhappy with the way that some people refused to accept the facts, refused to accept the findings of an independent Accountability Review Board, politicized everything about this terrible attack,” she said. “My job is to admit that we have to make improvements and we’re going to.”

For weeks she and Obama told us the attack was the result of a YouTube video. Clearly they lied but haven’t been held accountable. But it’s the fault of critics or something. So we should all feel bad for picking on her.

“There are some people in politics and in the press who can’t be confused by the facts,” she said. “They just will not live in an evidence-based world. And that’s regrettable. It’s regrettable for our political system and for the people who serve our government in very dangerous, difficult circumstances.”

How about providing some facts first before getting your panties in a knot? How about answering a damn question about it?

Tags: , ,

9 Responses to “Queen Hillary Raps Benghazi Critics, Says They Don’t Live in “Evidence-Based World””

  1. George on 1/01/13 at 9:53 am

    Does an evidence-based populace spawn a politician because her husband got blown by a fat intern?

  2. bandit on 1/01/13 at 10:31 am

    The Associated Press that critics of the administration’s handling of the attack don’t live in an “evidence-based world”

    So says the crazy cat-lady.

  3. Ragspierre on 1/01/13 at 10:49 am

    Puuuurrrr Hill-larry, the submissive facilitator of abusive men, not the least of whom is Monica’s serial abusing boyfriend.

    And she’s talking about “evidence-based”…!!!

    She didn’t get away with murder. But it was at least negligent homicide.

  4. MT Geoff on 1/01/13 at 11:17 am

    She’s right that we don’t live in an evidence-based world. In an evidence-based world, serial foreign policy failure would have gotten her fired because she’d have been a drag on Obama’s re-election chances. And that was well before Benghazi.
    She’s very lucky we don’t live in an evidence-based world because the evidence is against her.

  5. MT Geoff on 1/01/13 at 4:14 pm

    Lyle, go wash your keyboard with soap. I know it’s true, but it’s horrible to say it.

  6. Nahanni on 2/02/13 at 12:25 pm

    If we truly lived in an ‘evidence based world’ then Hillary, the rest of the Obama administration, the Democratic leadership and their MSM ‘handmaidens’ would be tried (and convicted) for treason. They are not, as some still think, merely incompetent-they know exactly what they are doing.

    On another note all the money that Teresa Heinz-Kerry and George Soros have spent over the decades has now been rewarded for they now have what they have wanted-a buffoon puppet that they control and will do exactly as they command as Secretary of State and a vapid waste of a “President’ who is little more then their ‘autopen’.