Here We Go: Reports Claims Boston Bomber Tamerlan Tsarnaev Read ‘Right-Wing’ Literature or Something

Posted by on Aug 05, 2013 at 6:52 am
tsarnaev

The left will be wetting themselves over this one today. You know, the same folks who in the immediate aftermath of the Boston Marathon bombing rushed to tie the terrorists to conservatives. Mind you, this is the BBC coming up with this nonsense.

One of the brothers suspected of carrying out the Boston bombings was in possession of right-wing American literature in the run-up to the attack, BBC Panorama has learnt.

Tamerlan Tsarnaev subscribed to publications espousing white supremacy and government conspiracy theories.

He also had reading material on mass killings.

Until now the Tsarnaev brothers were widely perceived as just self-styled radical jihadists.

Panorama has spent months speaking exclusively with friends of the bombers to try to understand the roots of their radicalisation.

The programme discovered that Tamerlan Tsarnaev possessed articles which argued that both 9/11 and the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing were government conspiracies.

Another in his possession was about “the rape of our gun rights”.

Reading material he had about white supremacy commented that “Hitler had a point”.

Tamerlan Tsarnaev also had literature which explored what motivated mass killings and noted how the perpetrators murdered and maimed calmly.

There was also material about US drones killing civilians, and about the plight of those still imprisoned in Guantanamo Bay.

Because as everyone knows the plight of those detained at Club Gitmo is a huge cause on the right. Inexplicably, the Daily Mail runs a story on this with a photo of Klansmen. In that case, shouldn’t we tie Tsarnaev to old Southern Democrats? In the meantime, something is missing from this story: The names of these alleged “right-wing” publications.

 

 

 

Tags: , , ,

10 Responses to “Here We Go: Reports Claims Boston Bomber Tamerlan Tsarnaev Read ‘Right-Wing’ Literature or Something”

  1. Phrankie Leigh on 5/05/13 at 9:49 am

    Riiiigght. Because there’s no Muslims who don’t believe 9/11 was an inside job or who believe Hitler had a point. Sure.

  2. Palooka on 5/05/13 at 9:52 am

    “In that case, shouldn’t we tie Tsarnaev to old Southern Democrats?”

    You mean the precursor to the modern GOP and Tea Party?

    We’re already doing that by calling them Right Wing.

  3. john on 5/05/13 at 9:56 am

    Abortion? God in schools? Separation of church and state? Tough on crime? Male dominance?

  4. rrpjr on 5/05/13 at 10:13 am

    >>”You mean the precursor to the modern GOP and Tea Party?”

    No, we mean Robert Byrd and Al Gore, Sr. (both voted against Civil Rights).

    >>”Religious fundamentalists tend to be Right Wing, yes. You act surprised.”

    That’s the ticket. Theocratic fascist Jihadists actually believe in individual rights and limited government. They’d fit right in to a Tea Party gathering. Sharia, you know.

    Idiot.

    By the way, radical Islam has always thought “Hitler had a point.”

  5. cool arrow on 5/05/13 at 10:41 am

    2. palooka

    1.A boxer that takes a dive
    2. a clumsy person
    3. a nosey person
    4. used as asshole
    5. a dumb person

    ***

    Finally. A leftist with an accurate screen name. Kudos to you, sir.

  6. cool arrow on 5/05/13 at 10:43 am

    2. palooka

    1.A boxer that takes a dive
    2. a clumsy person
    3. a nosey person
    4. used as asshole
    5. a dumb person

    ***

    I don’t know about 1-3, but 4 and 5 are certainly accurate.

  7. Sphynx on 5/05/13 at 11:14 am

    >>You mean the precursor to the modern GOP and Tea Party?

    This is so F*cking crazy I don’t know where to begin..

    No, the “modern” GOP began with Nixon and the Rockefellers, was reset a bit toward the good when Reagan took office and began drifting left again when George Bush took the mantle in 89. GWB was OK in foreign policy but nutso in spending, just like dad.

    The Tea Party is the antithesis to the “modern” GOP.

    I know the lefty LIV talking point is the “Southern Democrats” became Republicans.

    No, SOME of the offspring of “Southern Democrats” switched to Republican when the mainstream conservative sensible Democrats evaporated and the Democrat party was taken over by collectivists, statists and the New Left.

    MANY of the NORTH and SOUTH (and EAST and WEST) sensible Democrats became Republicans as well when common sense and fiscal responsibility fell off the Donkey.

    Looney, moronic, Low Info Voter nonsense these trolls go about spreading this crap like, well, manure.

  8. STW on 5/05/13 at 11:46 am

    Many if not most of those to the left equate Right-Wing and Nazi. Since neither Nazis or Moslems like Jews it is very plausible, if not likely, that this guy had anti-Semantic literature. There. Any left leaning editor worth his salt should be able to run with that all the way to Michele Malkin and Ann Colter.

  9. bob smetters on 5/05/13 at 12:32 pm

    Gee…. Islamic terrorists that lean to the right of the spectrum… whoda thunk it? Lol…. like this is news?