‘Gun Girls’ Humiliate CNN Tool Piers Morgan

Posted by on Jan 25, 2013 at 7:53 am

This obsessive, low-rated twit thinks he can handle some young female gun owners? Well, after his beatdown at the hands of Ben Shapiro a couple of weeks ago, he must think they’re an easier target. Well, he’s mistaken. He tries to sandbag them, of course, but gets owned. Apparently he believes talking over his guests makes him the winner of an argument. In the world of Piers Morgan, he’d rather these women be left unprotected.

He referred to Blankenship and Bigelow as “The Gun Girls,” – something liberal women would certainly not tolerate – and he asked them to justify their “need” for an AR-15.  The ‘Gun Girls’ did a great job explaining that AR-15s make great self-defense weapons as they are more accurate than handguns and with an extended magazine of 30 rounds, they provide a woman enough ammunition to fend off a home invader.

Since he was neutered at this point by “The Gun Girls” Morgan did what Morgan does, he began to bully them, including bringing up tangential issues not part of the agreed upon topics for the segment.

You just can’t humiliate this schmuck enough. Prediction: CNN will pull the plug on this clown long before AR-15’s are banned.

44 Responses to “‘Gun Girls’ Humiliate CNN Tool Piers Morgan”

  1. theBuckWheat on 25/25/13 at 9:32 am

    While we are proposing the limiting of magazines, let’s limit that vile Hustler Magazine to 10 pages or less.

  2. Dustin on 25/25/13 at 9:36 am

    Why does anyone ‘need’ that much free speech?

    Why does a suspect ‘need’ the best lawyer he can afford?

    Why does a citizen ‘need’ to vote on every last thing he cares about?

    Weird questions that betray a contempt for the rights of those who are different from Mr Morgan.

  3. skh.pcola on 25/25/13 at 10:29 am

    Piers is such a tool. I wish the Gun Girls would have mentioned that automatic weapons have been banned since the early 1930s. That’s not even a salient point in the discussion.

  4. Mark on 25/25/13 at 10:48 am

    To shameless steal a phrase seen elsewhere:
    I need an AR-15 just like Rosie Parks needed to sit in the front of the bus in Birmingham, AL.

  5. abgbulldog on 25/25/13 at 11:00 am

    Piers Morgan obviously doesn’t know the difference between an “automatic” and a “semiautomatic” weapon. And then, when the guests own him, changes the subject to women in combat roles in the military. What an absolute loser of a “reporter”.

  6. Rob in Katy on 25/25/13 at 11:09 am

    Automatic weapons are already banned! The AR15 is no different than any other hunting rifle, one pull = one shot.

  7. Eighth Note on 25/25/13 at 11:13 am

    Again!!! Why won’t these folks when asked by a Lib-talker, “Why do you need an AR 15 with a 30 round magazine?” answer: Why do police and SWAT Teams need them, and in massive numbers, when responding to a perp held up in a house or a lone gunman in a school?

  8. Doug on 25/25/13 at 11:18 am

    The real question here is why does Piers Morgan need to be on my television. Especially since he appears to have no talent for it.

    Click.

    Oh, I guess he doesn’t.

  9. GoldWingNut on 25/25/13 at 11:37 am

    Since the First and Second Amendments are almost always “compared”, I think we should treat them the same.
    Limits on the type of gun = limits on what you can talk about
    Background checks = background checks to make sure you haven’t violated any “hate laws” (which would shut down damn near any liberal)
    Magazine size = limit on what sort and how many social media sites you can “visit”

  10. Sandy Norris on 25/25/13 at 11:38 am

    I am issuing a challenge to Piers, come and get my gun. BYW, I’m a gun-packing Grandma!

  11. David Gillies on 25/25/13 at 11:54 am

    It’s a Bill of Rights, not a Bill of Needs. This cannot be stressed too much or too often.

  12. Michael Moore's Massive Shadow on 25/25/13 at 12:06 pm

    As deplorable as Piers Morgan is, these women were horrible advocates. They seemed out of their league and unprepared.

  13. amishmime on 25/25/13 at 12:26 pm

    I read recently that the Newtown shooter did not use the AR-15. It was found in his vehicle. He used 4 handguns, according to the coroner’s report.

  14. burt on 25/25/13 at 12:32 pm

    You would think a man who hated this country as much as he does would have enough brains to leave. No one is keeping him here.

  15. Norm on 25/25/13 at 12:45 pm

    I think you need to keep hitting PM with what Shapiro did ….. should we ban handguns Piers? That’s what’s killing the vast majority of people in this country, in the category of gun deaths.

    Press him on this, because according to his logic we need to outlaw things that are dangerous for large amounts of people. Ask him if the lives of 20 people killed over a week’s period are any less valuable than the 20 lives of people killed at one time.

    Since he’s a hack, he’s gonna want to keep with Obama’s line … I believe in the right of an individual to own firearms. But those firearms are dangerous to large amounts of people, Piers? Like 500 people were killed in a year in Chicago with them. Why aren’t you for banning them?

    Expose him as simply a political hack.

  16. Ace O'Dale on 25/25/13 at 12:49 pm

    Actually, automatic weapons should be pertinent to the discussion as in: the Second Amendment has nothing to do with hunting and everything to do with securing the freedom of these United States via the people of these United States. When tyrants rise to power, they do so with as much military and weaponry they can muster to enforce their dictatorship. The Second Amendment is all about countering any attempt at tyranny. Thus, high grade military hardware, owned by citizens for the defense of these United States, is closer to the spirit and intent of the Amendment than handguns and hunting rifles.

  17. Norm on 25/25/13 at 12:51 pm

    “I read recently that the Newtown shooter did not use the AR-15. It was found in his vehicle. He used 4 handguns, according to the coroner’s report.”

    Don’t know where you got this, but I read this:

    “All the victims at the school were shot with a rifle, at least some of them up close, and all were apparently shot more than once, Chief Medical Examiner Dr. H. Wayne Carver said.”

    Here:

    http://tinyurl.com/auok6f2

  18. Zaklog the Great on 25/25/13 at 1:10 pm

    It is so amazingly obnoxious how, to score some kind of points, he has to continually divert the conversation to irrelevant side issues.

  19. gastorgrab on 25/25/13 at 1:30 pm

    Citizens have no duty to show a “need” for any constitutional right.

    The burden of proof is on the government to show ‘why not’.

  20. Johnny drama on 25/25/13 at 2:33 pm

    How did the gun girls “humiliate” him? They both sat there with idiotic smiles on their faces during a serious discussion. Regardless of whether Piers knows that an off the shelf AR-15 is not fully auto, he did ask them a question about banning fully auto weapons and they could even come up with a coherent response. They humiliated themselves.

  21. Lynn on 25/25/13 at 4:12 pm

    The Bill of Rights does not grant any rights to citizens. It describes rights we already have, and guarantees against infringement of them – because it uses the passive voice, “shall not be infringed”, I presume it means “by anyone or anything at any time.”
    We hold these truths to be self- evident, indeed. I certainly have a right and a responsibility to defend my life, liberty, and property, and that of my neighbor against any threat to them. That holds true regardless of where I live in the world, or any flavor of politics to which I sway at any time. That right cannot be granted or given to me – it can ONLY be infringed. Our founding fathers didn’t attach any exceptions, conditions, or qualifications to the ban on infringement. No citizen of this country should agree to obey or enforce any infringement of this right.

  22. Nacho Mama on 25/25/13 at 4:39 pm

    Watch that video with the sound off & ask yourself if these young women appear to be talking about 2nd amendment rights, firearms, self-defense, mass shootings or any OTHER subject which requires mature thought & coherent talking points.

    They failed miserably, by their inability to STOP grinning like the proverbial possums eating crap. Even when the subject turned to Adam Lanza, neither was able to maintain a sober countenance for 30 seconds.

    If you want to sway opinions away from gun control measures, you darn well should be able to discuss keeping & using an AR-15 at home for self-defense WITHOUT wearing a huge insipid smile on your face.

    The humiliation in this exchange is on Bigelow & Blankenship for behaving like 2 junior high school girls discussing their shared crushes on the likes of Justin Bieber.

    Piers Morgan wasn’t owned or humiliated in that exchange, but those 2 young women managed to succeed beyond anyone’s wildest dreams of making young, female gun owners look far too immature to even look at a firearm, much less own & use one.

    Keep these two vapid young women as far away from the cameras as possible or get ready to have to repeatedly make the case that gun owners in general are not as idiotic as the two of them.

  23. Peter Jones on 25/25/13 at 8:27 pm

    Saw the interview. The only people “owned” were those two young girls. They had trouble answering the simplest of questions :

    “Do you agree, yes or no, that automatic weapons should be banned?”

  24. Ken on 26/26/13 at 12:23 am

    The point all of Morgans guests fail to make on “Automatic Weapons” is that they are not banned. They require a background check and a $200 dollar tax stamp. The GCA of 1984 limited the new production of automatic weapons, you can still get one and a Tax Stamp of you want one.

  25. badcafe on 26/26/13 at 4:06 am

    I think Piers did well… the ladies did not explain why they need AR-15s except that (a) they are more effective killing machines, and (b) the 2nd amendment allow their possession. Both are false arguments — one could equally well extend this to nukes, chemical weapons and so on — more effective, and hey — once again, second amendment. But all rights have limits, including the first (we can’t shout ‘fire’ in a public place), so arguing that somehow the second amendment is limitless is pointless, and in view of the fact that I can’t buy nukes legally, is already limited.

  26. Greg P on 26/26/13 at 10:33 am

    It is OK. Both of these Bimbos got their 10 minutes. They are just brainless idiots who, in less than 5-6 years will turn into fat cows, by which time they will have sucked on the limp flaccid appendages of many redneck uneducated a holes. They will have a litter.
    They think they are articulate, smart, coming on a show and talking about guns. These bimbos are nothing but a very good example of how America has dumbed down

    Nobody in America has their own opinion. If it is guns, the opinions are divided straight along party lines. Same thing with the environment.

    Let me guess. These bimbos do not believe in global warming either (because the political crap they have been fed does not believe in it)

    These idiots to not have the ability to think on their own. They probably grew up in some backward, nasty racist family and have probably never gone anywhere outside the periphery of their little right wing fiefdom

  27. Mary becker on 26/26/13 at 10:33 am

    Listening to Piers has given me a greater understanding of how the American Revolution came about. Big mouth, know it all Englishman who just will not shut up meets totally fed up American who has had enough. BOOM!

  28. John Perry on 26/26/13 at 11:32 am

    Greg,

    You’re are funny and a hypocrite. Reading your comment made me just about spit my coffee out. The hatred in your words is beyond troubling and it’s people like you and our current administration that is killing this country one day at a time. You better wake up and realized what is going on.

  29. Kurt on 26/26/13 at 11:49 am

    These two young ladies were the worst advocates for gun rights that could have ever gotten on TV. They did not make a coherent sentence, let alone a coherent point about why they should have an AR-15. (Lotta ammo to get the job done)
    They were unable to answer a simple “yes or no” question without giggling like school girls. Then the ridiculous statement of “That’s not what we are on the show for”. What?? You can’t answer a simple question without have to prepare an answer ahead of time. Start listening at 3:46 and listen to both of them mumble and fall over each other trying to answer the question about automatic weapons. PATHETIC response.

    For someone who is the Director of Communications for American Majority Action, Ms. Blankenship wasn’t able to come up with one intelligent sentence in the entire interview.

    These girls should go back to their college grassroots organizations and stay there. They are obviously not ready for a serious discussion about the subject of gun control.

  30. Greg on 26/26/13 at 12:23 pm

    What kind of person thinks these bimbos humiliated Morgan?

    The same kind of person that admires the likes of Sarah Palin, Rush Limbaugh, Michael Weiner Savage and Ann Coulter.

    Take a moment to look behind your rear. Yes, it is China that is squarely performing coitus on your poop chute while you are sitting in front of your computers trying to look smart about guns and

    Yes, by the time China is done with plunging your poop chutes, everything you own will have belonged to them

    And you deserve to be owned. You know why? Because you are the most arrogant dumb people with little less than 200 years of history .

    you decimated the native americans. ANd now you want to talk about rights and honor and free speech and the second amendment?

    By the way, Ann Coulter does not give a rat’s behind about you. She is doing it all for the money. And in her free time, she is sucking the schlong of the left wing nut job .what is his name..? Oh, yes. Bill Maher

    Same thing with pedophile sex tourist (many pedohphlic trips to Dominican republic), pill addict Rush Limbaugh. You dumbtards admire him and would eat his sh1t if you had the chance. Well, he despises you redneck wannabees He makes a lot of money and pisses on you.

    So, next time look and see how that Chinese d1ck i

  31. messalos on 27/27/13 at 7:48 am

    Greg and Greg P. – Kudos on showing the cyberworld how truly hypocritical you are. Is this what liberal trolling has resorted to? Truly entertaining reading your hate-fueled blabber. BTW, I own several legal firearms and have not voted for a Republican or Democrat in two decades, nor am I a member of the NRA. Good luck pigeon-holing law abiding gun owners into the so-called “redneck” stereotype. As far as Piers, no one has to “own” him. He has already shown the world what a sensationalist b00b he really is. He uses tactics on his guests that are no different than Rush or Coulter. But you would never admit that now would you.

  32. Greg P. on 27/27/13 at 1:43 pm

    Law abiding gun owners have nothing to fear from any legislation.

    It is you dumba$$ “muhricans” nut jobs who rabidly (and without any clear thought) talk about the second amendment and your rights and the “we the people” rant.

    The majority of you “muhricans” have no idea what the f&ck you are talking about. You have not read the constitution. You are just followers. You waive a flag that is made in China (you have no pride), you shop at Walmart for cheap Chinese goods (because you are too cheap to support American workers), you feed on fast food crap and are overweight, bankrupt and uneducated. Most of your marriages end in divorces. Most of you are broke, uneducated, divorced and laden with a litter by the time you turn 30.

    So, you turn on the radio, the TV and listen to the likes of Coulter and Limbaugh who spew hatred to rile idiots like you (while they make millions in the process)

    And you idiots in turn rant about how foreigners are taking away your jobs and how demographics have changed and how you dont have any opportunities.

    You dumb motherfvkers, just by being BORN in this country, you have won the luckof the draw. So many people born in other countries do not have the kind of opportunities you get by just being BORN here

    Yet you dumb idiots piss away that great opportunity and rave and rant about stupid stuff

    So fvck you

  33. Joel on 27/27/13 at 6:26 pm

    Great stuff. Love the subtext of sneering, condescending Brit attempting to take Americans’ rights away. #Battleroad.

  34. Greg on 27/27/13 at 9:24 pm

    Like I said, go ahead and argue rabidly about your rights to bear ridiculous arms

    And guess what, if the US Army really wants to come and get your guns, your fvking rifles or your automatic weapons or NOTHING stand a snowball’s chance in hell.

    Don’t you pea brains understand that the US Army is the most sophisticated army in the world and if they really want to take your guns, there is not one fvkcing things you rednecks can do???

    So fvk you again

  35. Greg on 1/01/13 at 8:49 pm

    Red_Right_Returning,
    Did your mom stop working at the red light district or is she returning at a ripe old age? Whom among the thousands of truckers she had liaisons with during her time as a lot lizard is your biological dad, did you find out?

  36. Libtard_as_well_as_Re(pub)tard on 2/02/13 at 5:54 pm

    I heard that many gun nuts hide the corpses of their dead wh0re mothers under their beds.

    Being that these losers lost their v1rg1nity to their moms (mom felt sorry for the loser and let him have it)

    I also heard that these gun nuts take out the rotting corpse of their wh0re moms from under their beds, skullfvck their ugly, withered rotten heards and feel satisfied.

    I also heard that most of these gun nut women lost their v1rginity to their dads, living in a small, cramped single wide trailer