Cities With Stiffest Gun Control Laws Prosecuted Fewest Federal Gun Crimes

Posted by on Mar 28, 2013 at 3:07 pm

Proving demonstrably once again how meaningless these feel-good gun laws are.

The districts that contain Chicago, Los Angeles and New York City ranked last in terms of federal gun law enforcement in 2012, according to a new report from Syracuse University’s Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, which tracks federal data.

Federal gun crimes include illegal possession of a firearm in a school zone, illegal sale of a firearm to a juvenile, felon, or drug addict, and illegal transport of a firearm across state lines. In Chicago, the majority of gun charges last year were for firearms violations.

The districts of Eastern New York, Central California, and Northern Illinois ranked 88th, 89th and 90th, respectively, out of 90 districts, in prosecutions of federal weapons crimes per capita last year, but it wasn’t always this way. All three districts fell lower on the list than they had been in years past. In 2010, for example, Chicago was 78th in federal weapons prosecutions.

These cities also have some of the nation’s most restrictive gun laws, as well as the most active mayors in championing gun control. New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel and Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa are all members of the national Mayors Against Illegal Guns campaign.

D.C., which also has tough gun laws, was in the lower half of the list in 2012, coming in at 78th. In 2011, D.C. prosecuted a higher number of gun crimes, coming in at number 49.

If you want gun crime to skyrocket nationwide then by all means go along with the gun-grabbers Obama and Bloomberg. Or better yet, take the common-sense approach to gun control and abolish most of these restrictive laws. It would result in a precipitous drop in crime and the anti-Second Amendment crowd knows that.

One Response to “Cities With Stiffest Gun Control Laws Prosecuted Fewest Federal Gun Crimes”

  1. MT Geoff on 29/29/13 at 11:59 am

    The federal prosecutions for gun laws may be weak. What are the local prosecutions like, though? That would make a more valid comparison.
    I don’t think these areas do a good job of prosecuting criminals under their firearms laws; I know they’ve sometimes harassed and made criminals of residents who were using guns responsibly.