Walid Shoebat: Innocence of Muslims Film was Made by Terrorists; Update: Feds Arrest Nakoula

Posted by on Sep 27, 2012 at 6:17 pm

If you’re unfamiliar with Walid Shoebat, here’s some background. If what he claims here is true, it further demolishes the Obama canard that this single YouTube video led to widespread violence in the Mideast, along with the terror attack that killed Chris Stevens in Libya.

That narrative has already imploded and would be a major scandal if only the media decided to do their job.

So what to make of this?

So lets examine facts instead of the filmmaker’s fiction.

Court documents reveal that Nakoula Bacile Nakoula, producer of the movie Innocence of Muslims, partnered in a scheme with Eiad Salameh, my first cousin.

Eiad is a Muslim terror supporter and is not an Egyptian Copt.

He comes from Beit Sahour, Bethlehem and is well known by the FBI and the Arab community as a conduit for Middle Easterners who can obtain authentic, legitimate identifications, from passports to credit cards that include many nationalities. He then places these forms of identification into the hands of dubious characters that are not the real identity.

In fact, I revealed Eiad Salameh way before this whole fiasco erupted—in 2008 and the first reporting on the connection between Eiad and Nakoula was revealed on September 14th, 2012 by the Smoking Gun, which published court documents that prove these two were connected in 2009, as part of a major financial fraud scheme.

The narrative that circulates the media fails to address crucial questions about the mystery of this film.

For example, to date, no one has stepped forward or can confirm for certain that whoever holds an identity by the name of Nakoula Bacile Nakoula is even that man. After all, he held several identifications, including Muslim names. He could have easily presented a valid I.D. when he was arrested, yet he was likely not the man on that I.D.

Such a claim isn’t easily dismissed; if an Egyptian by the name of Nakoula Bacile Nakoula is blamed for angering over a billion Muslims, it would not be that difficult to find the entire family in Egypt, to include brothers, cousins, aunts, siblings wife, wives, ex-wives, mistresses, and pets, et. al., especially since the riots that spanned across 30 nations were sparked in Egypt.

In the Middle East, you are known by your clan. Yet, Egypt cannot produce neither this man’s family or his background?

Besides, why would Nakoula – who claims to be a religious Coptic activist – have extensive connections with Eiad, a man who I know hates Copts and is well-known to be among the best schemers the Middle East produced and has contacts with terror networks?

Read the whole thing. Some of his evidence here may seem tenuous, but there sure is a lot more there than anyone in the Obama media has produced.

Update: Well, they have their scapegoat.

The producer of the controversial anti-Islam film “Innocence of Muslims” has been arrested for violating terms of his probation and is set for a court appearance this afternoon in U.S. District Court in Los Angeles.

Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, 55, is scheduled for an initial appearance before Judge Christina Snyder, who sentenced him in June 2009 following a bank fraud conviction.

Tags: , ,

2 Responses to “Walid Shoebat: Innocence of Muslims Film was Made by Terrorists; Update: Feds Arrest Nakoula”

  1. AW1 Tim on 28/28/12 at 7:15 am

    So let me toss this out for consideration:

    1.) These two “film makers” are likely terrorist enablers, if not terrorists themselves.

    2.) The “film” was a vehicle to rake in donations from investors who thought they’d be producing some anti-Islam film.

    3.) This “film” was planned, from the beginning, to be used as a pretext to cover for attacks upon US Embassy staff and structure, AND they get the double bonus of being able to use it as a pretext for attacking Christian Copts in Egypt sine the film makers were allegedly Copts themselves.

    4) so now the terrorists get to laugh all around as they were able to get non-muslims to support this entire venture.

    Man, we so need a Romney win in order to get some adults back running things in this country.

  2. MT Geoff on 28/28/12 at 10:33 am

    Howdy Tim
    The points you make could have happened under any president. The US is a free country (it used to be more free and can be again) and the president would not know about a few people who were up to a dodgy project.
    It’s possible the film was a plant from the beginning, of course, but even if it was, the Benghazi attack seems to have no link to it.
    I do believe that President Bush or President Romney would have had far better security at the consulate than President Obama did. Secretary Powell or Secretary Rice or Secretary Bolton (I can hope) would surely have asked for better security, probably demanded it.