Video: College ‘Student’ Goes Wild, Threatens to Kill Professor and Classmates

Posted by on Mar 22, 2012 at 8:13 am

Good times at Florida Atlantic University. So nice to be living in a post-racial era.

Celebrate diversity!

Associate Professor Stephen M. Kajiura was reviewing with his evolution class in GS 120 for a midterm when FAU student Jonatha Carr interrupted him: “How does evolution kill black people?” she asked. Kajiura attempted to explain that evolution doesn’t kill anyone.

And then, Carr became violent.

A fellow classmate, Rachel Bustamante, was sitting behind Carr prior to her outburst and noticed she had been avoiding looking at the professor until 11:35 a.m. — that’s when she snapped. The classmate reported that Kajiura was discussing attraction between peacocks when Carr raised her hand to ask her question about evolution. She asked it four times, and became increasingly upset each time Kajiura’s answer failed to satisfy her.

A video taken by Bustamante shows Carr ranting and threatening to kill the professor and several students. At this point, the witness who contacted the police claimed, “No one was comfortable in the room. I realized the situation was escalating and went out to call the police.” Seconds later, Carr walked down an aisle of the classroom and slammed the palm of her hand into the forehead of a male student.

Kajiura stayed in the room, trying to keep the class calm, while a few students stepped out to call police. “She became increasingly belligerent,” he said. “It was at this point, a highly emotionally charged individual who was no longer capable of responding rationally. She was threatening to kill both me and the students in the class.”

Extreme language warning. Oh, and just a bit of a racist attitude.

Via Tim Blair.


17 Responses to “Video: College ‘Student’ Goes Wild, Threatens to Kill Professor and Classmates”

  1. Mephitis on 22/22/12 at 11:15 am

    get this girl some contraception soon.

    Announcing that she will run for office in 3..2..1. because of getting 3 e-mails from strangers telling her that she has promise, and is a special snowflake.

  2. SamIam on 22/22/12 at 11:46 am

    I fail to understand what inspired this Obama supporter to start speaking truth to power so passionately. Can someone enlighten me in the cause of justice?

  3. AmishDude on 22/22/12 at 11:48 am

    Actually…eugenics was a big part of the early proponents of evolution. Darwin was fairly explicit about it (albeit without specifics) in his second book, the one everybody forgets. His cousin, Galton, was more explicit.

    But what is much more likely is that this young woman has simply been inundated with race and it’s the only thing on her mind.

  4. Tom Smith on 22/22/12 at 12:50 pm

    Evolution and scientific materialism killed hundreds of millions of people in the 20th century. Nazism, Communism, abortion, eugenics, euthanasia are all direct results of Darwinism. Margaret Sanger, of Planned Parenthood infamy, was a strong supporter of eugenics. After WWII when Nazi atrocities became known, the eugenics movement in America (including state laws as upheld by SCOTUS) faded into oblivion, to be replaced by birth control and abortion. Eugenics sought to weed out the misfits in society, such as the mentally unfit, criminals, and certain “lower races;” and the early supporters of abortion/ birth control sought to do the same. This was all part of creating a better race of super-humans, in accordance with survival of the fittest as proposed by the Darwinian religion. The greatest enemy of the black community is the Democratic party.

  5. Trimegistus on 22/22/12 at 1:02 pm

    Watching without sound it’s pretty obvious this chick is drunk and/or stoned.

  6. Doggyodog on 22/22/12 at 1:15 pm

    Everything she said had been fed into her by every teacher since Kindergarten. Plus the media. It was only that she said it with the appropriate emotion required for such racist drivel. Notice the white teacher just standing there like an oil painting while his own students are assaulted and threatened. That’s a guy on tenure track and he knows which side his bread is buttered on.

  7. Nick Shaw on 22/22/12 at 4:42 pm

    Are you sure this isn’t a clip from when Moochelle was in college?
    After all, she wasn’t happy until Zero was elected and this girl looks really unhappy!
    On a more serious note, she may have had some complaint with the connection between Darwinism and eugenics, though why she would bring it up while discussing the mating habits of peacocks will remain a mystery, I suppose.
    Wouldn’t her outrage be better expressed in front of a Planned Parenthood office?
    It was formed with the express purpose of getting rid of her race (among others) and still does, does it not?

  8. Ranger69 on 22/22/12 at 5:21 pm

    Wow I think we need to get a million man march out for this girl? Oh wait white people don’t do that? I guess when you drink a 40 and pop a zanex it’s not good for a 8 am class, were is spike lee he could make a movie do the wrong thing!

  9. Bobby on 22/22/12 at 5:24 pm

    Evolution and scientific materialism killed hundreds of millions of people in the 20th century. Nazism, Communism, abortion, eugenics, euthanasia are all direct results of Darwinism.

    I’m trying to walk a fine line here and not be purposefully belligerent and calling you a moron (oops, I just did) but I’ve tried a number of different starts to this comment and this one seems to be the most polite.

    Evolution hasn’t murdered anyone. People applying the principles of evolution haven’t murdered anyone, in fact, people employing the principles of evolution have likely saved hundreds of millions of lives through the application of those principles in medical research.

    Communists were famously anti-Darwin. Have you not heard of their attempts to create the “New Soviet Man” and their squelching of Evolutionary principles in favor of Lysenkoism?

    The Nazis didn’t use evolutionary principles, they simply claimed to be using evolutionary principles. Think of it this way – liberals like to claim that they’re guided by reason and logic and yet look at all of the balderdash they believe in. If they actually applied reason and logic in their lives then their entire world view would collapse at their feet.

    Eugenics is a sound practice that we all use in our own lives – you don’t see many people purposely seeking out spouses with birth defects and you don’t see many people hoping and praying to have their children born with birth defects.

    All the sins that you’re attributing to evolution are really the result of state coercion. The problem of seeking to create healthy people through the use of evolutionary principles, eugenics, isn’t a problem when applied individually, it’s a problem when the STATE coerces and controls one’s reproductive choices.

  10. Ryan on 22/22/12 at 9:22 pm

    “I don’t know all the facts, but I do know that the faculty and other students acted stupidly.”

  11. Tom Smith on 23/23/12 at 2:44 am


    Lysenko? One flake in the history of the USSR, known principally for his ‘work’ in the field of agriculture, does not negate the fact that Marx, Engels, Lenin, Stalin, et al, were enormously influenced by Darwin.

    From a quick search of the Internet:

    “The communists recognized the importance of Darwin to their movement and therefore vigorously defended him: The socialist movement recognized Darwinism as an important element in its general world outlook right from the start. When Darwin published his Origin of Species in 1859, Karl Marx wrote a letter to Frederick Engels in which he said, ‘ . . . this is the book which contains the basis in natural history for our view’. . . . And of all those eminent researchers of the nineteenth century who have left us such a rich heritage of knowledge, we are especially grateful to Charles Darwin for opening our way to an evolutionary, dialectical understanding of nature.’ Prominent communist Friedrich Lessner concluded that Das Kapital and Darwin’s Origin of Species were the ‘two greatest scientific creations of the century’. The importance of Darwinism in the estimated 140 million deaths caused by communism was partly because: ‘Clearly, for Marx man has no ‘nature’. . . . For man is his own maker and will consciously become his own maker in complete freedom from morality or from the laws of nature and of nature’s God. . . . Here we see why Marxism justifies the ruthless sacrifice of men living today, men who, at this stage of history, are only partly human.’ ‘The only piece of art work in Lenin’s office was a kitsch statue of an ape sitting on a heap of books—including Origin of Species—and contemplating a human skull. This . . . comment in clay on Darwin’s view of man, remained in Lenin’s view as he worked at his desk, approving plans or signing death warrants . . . . The ape and the skull were a symbol of his faith, the Darwinian faith that man is a brute, the world is a jungle, and individual lives are irrelevant.” (see also, Darwin’s influence on Stalin and others.)

    As for “the Nazis didn’t use evolutionary principles, they simply claimed to be using evolutionary principles:” No, they actually used evolutionary principles in speeding along survival of the fittest, by killing millions of those whom they believed to be untermenschen. Just because they were wrong in their actions doesn’t mean they didn’t employ principles of the Darwinian religion and were not driven by their belief in Darwinism. Birds of a feather flock to Darwin.

    “All the sins that you’re attributing to evolution are really the result of state coercion.” — Did I say otherwise? You say that I am a moron (is this even relevant?– or is it that you have difficulty controlling your emotions because of my comments about your godless Darwinian religion?), but you seem to have drifted here. Please follow the logic: You argue against the point I made by asserting the point I made.

    Eugenics, as codified into numerous US state laws prior to WWII, was an attempt to weed out undesirables by adherents of the Darwinian religion. The calamity of Nazism set back this effort in the US and caused it to morph into other efforts to, again, weed out undesirables– through the abortion of unwanted babies (in many cases for economic reasons, or birth defects), and those who wish to end their own lives, or those who do not (Terry Schiavo, et al.)

    “in fact, people employing the principles of evolution have likely saved hundreds of millions of lives through the application of those principles in medical research.” Like Dr Josef Mengele?

    Oh, I’m sure there are scientists who ‘believe in Darwinism’ who have made important medical discoveries, but they absolutely did not do it because of the science behind Darwinism, because Darwinism is not even a falsifiable scientific theory– it is more properly a philosophy or a religion. There is no scientific proof supporting Darwinism– nor could there ever be– because it is false. It is one of history’s biggest lies. Tell me what proof there is that goes beyond inference or speculation or belief or consensus? An example of the total lack of proof: If macro-evolution has occurred there would be thousands of intermediaries in the fossil record, but instead what we see is all the monkeys who support Darwinian evolution get all excited about some African fossil that turns out to be just a slightly different looking orangutan. Again– there would be thousands of examples of intermediaries– they would be as commonplace as any other fossils.

    Had Darwin never published his ideas there undoubtedly would be a lot more people alive today, e.g., the current population of Russia would likely be about double what it is today had it not been for WWII & Communism. Darwinism & its companion scientific materialism is foolishly taken seriously, which has killed millions of people in its brief history.

    If you believe in Darwinism then you should acknowledge all of the people who have suffered and died as a result of its various manifestations.