Obama and the L-Word: ‘Liar’ is potent and ugly—with a sleazy political pedigree

Posted by on Oct 11, 2012 at 8:48 am

The election campaign of the 44th U.S. president is now calling another candidate for the American presidency a “liar.” This is a new low. It is amazing and depressing to hear this term being used as a formal strategy by people at the highest level of American politics.

“Liar” is a potent and ugly word with a sleazy political pedigree. But “liar” is not being deployed only by party attack dogs or the Daily Kos comment queue. Mitt Romney is being called a “liar” by officials at the top of the Obama re-election campaign. Speaking the day after the debate in the press cabin of Air Force One, top Obama adviser David Plouffe said, “We thought it was important to let people know that someone who would lie to 50 million Americans, you should have some questions about whether that person should sit in the Oval Office.”

The Democratic National Committee’s Brad Woodhouse said, “Plenty of people have pointed out what a liar Mitt Romney is.” Deputy campaign manager Stephanie Cutter says Republicans “think lying is a virtue.”

Explicitly calling someone a “liar” is—or used to be—a serious and rare charge, in or out of politics. It’s a loaded word. It crosses a line. “Liar” suggests bad faith and conscious duplicity—a total, cynical falsity.

Full story.

One Response to “Obama and the L-Word: ‘Liar’ is potent and ugly—with a sleazy political pedigree”

  1. lyle on 11/11/12 at 12:14 pm

    This administration and campaign (pardon the redunancy) have set new lows in civility, decorum, and respect for American’s intelligence. Quite a feat.