Must be an Election Year: Moochelle Slumming It in $35 Target Dress

Posted by on Feb 14, 2012 at 8:10 am

She’ll obviously do anything so as to afford another four years living in luxury on the taxpayer dime. Just imagine the agony of The Queen as she had to lower herself into wearing a measly $35 dress.

Must have been a horrifying experience. Seriously, $35? Heck, that’s hardly the cost of an appetizer at one of her frequent lavish dinners. And then to be photographed wearing it. What utter humiliation.

As you can tell by the photo, she even pretended to be enjoying herself as she had dinner with some of the little people.

What a dehumanizing evening it must have been.

She famously chose to wear his frothy white design to her husband’s inauguration ball, propelling his name into households around the world.

Now, Michelle Obama, 48, is supporting Jason Wu again – albeit on a rather more diminutive scale – while watching her pennies.

The First Lady chose to wear a Jason Wu for Target dress, costing around $35, to a home visit in Ocoee, Florida, where she ate dinner with a local family over the weekend.

The navy sleeveless chiffon dress, in a floral pattern, cost a mere snippet in comparison to what the Taiwan-born designer usually charges for his coveted frocks, which run into the thousands of dollars.

The first lady chose to pair her dress with a red belt, rather than the ‘gold’ – closer to a mustard yellow – accessory that is sold with the dress.



12 Responses to “Must be an Election Year: Moochelle Slumming It in $35 Target Dress”

  1. hutch1200 on 14/14/12 at 10:51 am

    Well, she did have to sit on those filthy commoner chairs, not her throne. Don’t wanna wear something nice that will forever carry the stench of her lessors. Besides she’ll donate it to GoodWill and still take a $3500 write-off, while getting photographed as a humanitarian donor!

  2. HeatherRadish on 14/14/12 at 11:15 am

    The blog Michelle’s Mirror did a post another time she pulled this “dress from Target” schtick that detailed the hundreds of dollars in alterations (including adding more fabric, snort) she had done before she wore it.

    Off-hand, I’d say the belt she “chose” to wear instead of included belt cost at least four times as much as the dress.

  3. OxyCon on 14/14/12 at 1:14 pm

    Now it’s time to go to Target and find out what slave shop country that particular dress was made at and hit Mooch for wearing a dress made by children at a slave sweat shop.

  4. Blue Hen on 14/14/12 at 2:10 pm

    Obama was supposedly gonna ad-[i]dress[/i] the large, ugly issues of the country. This isn’t it.

  5. rpg on 15/15/12 at 11:45 am

    What this demonstrates is that no matter what the “bitter one” is wearing, no matter what it costs, she looks vile wearing it and whatever shes wearing looks hidious on her.

    You put a nice dress and lipstick on a Klingon its still a Klingon