Finally: The Mother-Daughter Porn Team

Posted by on Dec 07, 2012 at 7:42 am
sextons

Nah, nothing weird about this or anything. Besides, in this tough economy girls gotta do what they gotta do.

A mother and daughter in Tampa, Fla., have a unique way of expressing family togetherness — by creating a pornography site and shooting sex scenes together.

The duo — known collectively as “The Sexxxtons” — like many porn performers, don’t give out their last names. Jessica, the mom, and Monica, the daughter, have been creating kinky content for their self-titled website for the past year and have just released a DVD.

In order to confirm the Sexxxtons are really related and not just claiming that as a marketing gimmick, The Huffington Post reviewed both women’s driver’s licenses, and their private Facebook pages, as well as private family photos going back 20 years.

Sexxxtons, get it? That’s some clever marketing. Since they’re in it for the dough, may we recommend $exxxton$?  Think about it, ladies.

Monica acknowledges the mother-daughter porn is enjoyable. “I enjoy the sex and I enjoy being with my mom,” she said. “During the scenes, I think about how we’re going to be filthy rich.”

Another added bonus is saving on wardrobe costs, another plus in this downtrodden economy.

“The money was part of the reason, but so was fun, and having sex with hot guys,” Jessica said, adding that she prefers her new job to her old career, bartending, for one simple reason: “You don’t have to get dressed to go to work.”

Suddenly the Kardashians look respectable.

I’d HT the guy who sent this but he probably doesn’t want the attention.

19 Responses to “Finally: The Mother-Daughter Porn Team”

  1. Dustin on 7/07/12 at 11:48 pm

    What should be horrifying probably gets a yawn from most folks these days. The culture is corroded to this point. What’s next?

  2. edh on 7/07/12 at 11:50 pm

    “During the scenes, I think about how we’re going to be filthy rich.”

    Well, filthy anyway.

  3. Amos on 8/08/12 at 12:19 am

    Lighten up guys, it’s just porn. They’re making their own damn money and it’s frankly none of your business how.

    I’m a hundred times more revolted by the Obamaphone woman.

  4. L on 8/08/12 at 3:39 am

    @Amos
    Hear, hear.
    If one doesn’t like porn, don’t watch it.

    As for the Obamaphone lady… am I the only one who thinks she sounds like just that character Geraldine, that comedian Flip Wilson used to do, years ago? I swear, if she’d said, “The devil made me do it,” she’d have nailed it. The first time I saw the Obamaphone lady video, I thought she was doing that voice as a put-on.

  5. Tim maguire on 8/08/12 at 6:35 am

    Amos and L, I’m mostly in agreement with you, but a mother-daughter porn duo isn’t just about porn. Yes, people’s sex lives and legal (or in some cases illegal) occupations are none of our business, but most mothers want better for their daughters.

    There’s nothing wrong with being saddened and disgusted by a family where the mother doesn’t.

  6. Keyser Soze on 8/08/12 at 6:53 am

    And here I thought Conservatives, you know the rugged individualist who will go their own way, weren’t supposed to judge other people. I thought that was what the party of hypocrisy did. Silly me.

    If the biggest problem this nation faces is a mother and daughter (both of age and freely making the choice) making some porn that other people want to pay for and watch – it’s time to break out the bubbly and raise a few toasts to our good health.

  7. sjharris on 8/08/12 at 7:20 am

    @Keyser Soze (I thought we’d never hear from you again) Well I guess you thought wrong which means you need to be educated. Everybody makes judgment. Ironically and hypocritically you make judgments about Conservatives. Rugged individualism is a great thing but a man has to know his limitations.

    A person can rub feces all over themselves but they can’t then get in a crowded elevator without consequences (suggestion: kick them out, don’t push with your hands). I haven’t seen a comment that says that mom and daughter can’t fornicate together with a lot of different men. I do however see acceptance of such behavior, a failure to recognize the immorality of the behavior (unless mom and daughter are really good looking (just kidding)), as a weakening of the intangible thing known as the social fabric.

    You are right to say you are silly. You criticize Conservatives for expressing an opinion yet when two depraved individuals (unless they are really good looking, just kidding again) exercise their rights to freedom of expression in an inappropriate way you cheer. You seem to support freedom only when it is against societal norms.

  8. Awkard on 8/08/12 at 7:43 am

    Ewww…grosss. Luckily no male family member is involved (yet) so no inbred club footed eggplant offspring will come of it.

  9. bandit on 8/08/12 at 9:23 am

    “During the scenes, I think about how we’re going to be filthy rich.”

    I’ll go out on a limb with the prediction that this really won’t be as lucrative as Miss Midas thinks.

  10. Pi Guy on 8/08/12 at 9:59 am

    Sounds like we’re finally getting back to entrepreneurism in this country. It’s about time.

    And it’s not place to judge the manner in which anyone else chooses to make their way in this world.

  11. Bob on 8/08/12 at 10:29 am

    As sjharris points out, nobody has called for this to be illegal but it is morally reprehensible to conservatives and just plain yucky to most people. Where libertarians, such as myself, have a problem is with the religious conservatives who want to legislate morality. The fiscal conservatives who want smaller government are our allies.

    But even a libertarian can think that there are things that are morally reprehensible, we just believe your right to freedom trumps our desire to not be morally offended.

  12. dch on 8/08/12 at 10:49 am

    There is a huge difference from considering it immoral or disgusting and saying it should banned. None here have, so far, said “there aught’a be a law”. Conservatives or libertarians can disagree with behavior, comment on it ethics, its implications for society, yet full expect and defend what they consider repugnant’s legality.

    That is NOT hypocracy.

  13. Rich Vail on 8/08/12 at 1:55 pm

    At least they’re making money…I’m going to lose my job in January. half the cabinetmakers in the Baltimore, MD have closed in the past 3 years. I expect half of the rest will close within the next 2 years.

  14. Blue Hen on 8/08/12 at 5:27 pm

    Keyser Soze on 8/08/12 at 6:53 am

    And here I thought

    And that’s when he told his first lie.

    Freedom of speech includes the freedom to criticize. “Social conservatives” didn’t send a guy to prison for blasphemy against Islam. Lovely leftists did.

  15. Deoxy on 9/09/12 at 12:58 am

    Where libertarians, such as myself, have a problem is with the religious conservatives who want to legislate morality.

    No, you just have a problem when they want to legislate morality you disagree with or think the government shouldn’t enforce.

    Example: murder. Legislation against murder is legislating morality.

    Now, realistically, I want a very libertarian government, because I think giving the government the power to even attempt to legislate much more morality than that is a “cure” worse than the disease, but that’s still legislating morality.

    Oh, and Keyser Soze – I was going to respond, but my thoughts have been pretty well covered by dch and sjharris… but really, I have to commend Blue Hen for really getting to the meat of the problem. Ouch, hen – that would leave a mark, if lefties had a conscience.

  16. I R A Darth Aggie on 14/14/12 at 3:46 pm

    There is right and there is wrong, moral absolutes if you will. When these are ignored, society degrades.

    Ah, so whose moral absolutes are you willing to accept?

    Hammurabi?
    Buddah?
    Christ?
    Mohammed?

    “Social conservatives” didn’t send a guy to prison for blasphemy against Islam. Lovely leftists did.

    Yes, they did. But that’s also a “moral absolute”, from their point of view.