Considering the presidential race is again considered a dead heat according to the latest Quinnipiac poll, the failed president has decided to continue with his absurd “War on Women” angle to try and keep naive women in the fold. On Wednesday we discovered Obama made up a fictional composite girlfriend for his book likely written by Bill Ayers. Now his campaign has conjured up another fictional character to attack Mitt Romney with.
The campaign sent supporters an interactive tool — named “The Life of Julia” — that spotlights differences between the two candidates.
“The tool tracks how President Obama and Mitt Romney’s policies will affect Julia, a typical middle-class woman, at each step in her life — from early childhood, through her school years, until she has a child of her own, starts a business and retires,” the campaign says.
Indeed, it’s about as pathetic as you’d expect.
Under President Obama: Julia is enrolled in a Head Start program to help get her ready for school. Because of steps President Obama has taken to improve programs like this one, Julia joins thousands of students across the country who will start kindergarten ready to learn and succeed.
Under Mitt Romney: The Romney/Ryan budget could cut programs like Head Start by 20%, meaning the program would offer 200,000 fewer slots per year.
These boobs like to blame all their failures on George W. Bush, but oddly there no mention Bush was the one who implemented the reform of Head Start. So he’ll gladly take credit for something Bush did when it’s convenient.
This ridiculous “Life of Julia” goes all the way to 67 years of age, when 64 years from now the evil Romney will take away her Social Security or something. As if Social Security will actually exist in its current form in 2076.
Under President Obama: Julia retires. After years of contributing to Social Security, she receives monthly benefits that help her retire comfortably, without worrying that she’ll run out of savings. This allows her to volunteer at a community garden.
Under Mitt Romney: Julia’s benefits could be cut by 40%.
Could be cut by 40%? Really? But hey, if Obama is re-elected, she’ll be happy toiling at the community garden. And honestly, 64 years from now will anyone be able to live “comfortably” on Social Security? If Obama believes this he’s even more oblivious than we thought.
Is anyone swayed by this nonsense?