Another Obama Composite Character: Romney Now Attacking Fictional 3-Year-Old Children or Something

Posted by on May 03, 2012 at 7:49 am

Considering the presidential race is again considered a dead heat according to the latest Quinnipiac poll, the failed president has decided to continue with his absurd “War on Women” angle to try and keep naive women in the fold. On Wednesday we discovered Obama made up a fictional composite girlfriend for his book likely written by Bill Ayers. Now his campaign has conjured up another fictional character to attack Mitt Romney with.

The campaign sent supporters an interactive tool — named “The Life of Julia” — that spotlights differences between the two candidates.

“The tool tracks how President Obama and Mitt Romney’s policies will affect Julia, a typical middle-class woman, at each step in her life — from early childhood, through her school years, until she has a child of her own, starts a business and retires,” the campaign says.

Indeed, it’s about as pathetic as you’d expect.

Under President Obama: Julia is enrolled in a Head Start program to help get her ready for school. Because of steps President Obama has taken to improve programs like this one, Julia joins thousands of students across the country who will start kindergarten ready to learn and succeed.

Under Mitt Romney: The Romney/Ryan budget could cut programs like Head Start by 20%, meaning the program would offer 200,000 fewer slots per year.

These boobs like to blame all their failures on George W. Bush, but oddly there no mention Bush was the one who implemented the reform of Head Start. So he’ll gladly take credit for something Bush did when it’s convenient.

This ridiculous “Life of Julia” goes all the way to 67 years of age, when 64 years from now the evil Romney will take away her Social Security or something. As if Social Security will actually exist in its current form in 2076.

Under President Obama: Julia retires. After years of contributing to Social Security, she receives monthly benefits that help her retire comfortably, without worrying that she’ll run out of savings. This allows her to volunteer at a community garden.

Under Mitt Romney: Julia’s benefits could be cut by 40%.

Could be cut by 40%? Really? But hey, if Obama is re-elected, she’ll be happy toiling at the community garden. And honestly, 64 years from now will anyone be able to live “comfortably” on Social Security? If Obama believes this he’s even more oblivious than we thought.


Is anyone swayed by this nonsense?


Tags: ,

18 Responses to “Another Obama Composite Character: Romney Now Attacking Fictional 3-Year-Old Children or Something”

  1. Blue Hen on 3/03/12 at 8:44 am

    taking credit for the efforts of others? Check

    Placing far too much credit on head Start programs, which have dubious advantages? Check.

    Scaremongering? check

    No mention of the need for drastic SS reform, if it is even to stay alive in any form by the projected date? check

    Yep. This is moving forward all right. If you’re a no-talent mob agitating thug. For a President? Not so much.

  2. Don on 3/03/12 at 9:24 am

    SS is currently operating in the Red, there is no way it lasts for any significant amount of time in it’s current form. SS is the “new welfare” now, anyone can get paid from it for even the flimsiest excuse, thanks to “welfare reform” in the 90’s.

  3. Sgt Snuggle Bunny on 3/03/12 at 10:18 am

    Under President Obama: Julia grows-up and goes to college where she becomes a fictionalized white girlfriend reminescing dreamily about a young, sexually-warm Barack sitting around the apartment in a blue sarong, eating raisins and working on the NY Times crossword puzzle.

  4. Alec Leamas on 3/03/12 at 10:22 am

    Under Obama’s policies, Julia has no better than a 78% chance of even making it outside the birth canal intact. If Julia’s mother lives in New York City, she has only a 59% chance.

    Then, if she survives the birth canal gauntlet, Julia has just over a 50% chance that her mother and father will be married. If unmarried, Julia will likely be exposed to a carousel of men who have seriatim relationships with her mother, who are statistically much more likely to sexually abuse Julia than her own father.

    By economic circumstance, Julia will attend public schools, even if she has the talent and desire to attend a nearby private school as there is no school choice available to her. She will receive early “comprehensive sex education” and will have precocious sexual encounters before she is mentally and emotionally prepared for sex. She may get pregnant or contract an STD, but a well-funded Planned Parenthood will quietly mitigate the situation and keep this information from Julia’s parent(s), so they will not understand the source of her resulting depression.

    Julia may graduate from high school. She may not. Either way, she will have no proficiency in Math or Science and will not read and write the English language beyond the Fourth Grade level. She will, however, know how to deploy a condom on a cucumber and that the internal combustion engine is destroying the planet. The teachers’ Union thinks that it has done a great job, and they will have done an acceptable job in educating Julia according to Obama’s policies.

    Over the course of Julia’s young life, the private institutions – particularly religious in character – which may have helped improve the quality of her life and her life’s prospects do not have the ability to do so as a result of Obama’s tax policy and his aggressive curtailing of First Amendment religious liberty. Obama’s second-term judicial appointees to the Supreme Court have swayed the Court’s balance and have held that the First Amendment now protects only the “freedom to worship,” subject to the government’s compelling interest to prohibit “hate” against homosexuals and sexist beliefs about women. However, most of the Bible – if spoken publicly – is still not hate speech that can be the cause of criminal prosecution.

    Julia may then enter the workforce without job skills with an existing double-digit unemployment rate, and fall back into the “public safety net.” If Julia qualifies for college, she will then take on over a hundred thousand dollar debt (or more) for the privilege of learning how awful the United States is. She will likely graduate without skills sought by the few employers who are hiring.

    After decades of “paying her fair share” including payroll taxes, Julia will not be able to retire, because the Social Security system is insolvent and the 2065 Congress, after raising the top marginal income tax rate to 96% experienced an unexpected reduction in revenues received and therefore cannot make the expected Social Security benefits payments.

    Julia falls ill, but because she was a smoker and overweight, Health and Human Services regulations implementing the Affordable Care Act and the Medicare system preclude the operation which would have prolonged her life an additional 5 or 10 years.

    Julia dies. If she has a significant Estate, the government takes half of it. Either way, her state of residence taxes her testamentary gifts to her family members.

    The state has shaped the arc of Julia’s life from her very conception to her death, a testament to the success of Obama’s policies.

  5. Lucy on 3/03/12 at 10:36 am

    Alec Leamas on 3/03/12 at 10:22 am


    Alec, that was a thing of beauty! Bravo.

  6. Mephitis on 3/03/12 at 10:52 am


    The RNC should publish your version immediately.

    Then a second version for Shamika, who does not have the rosy outlook you have painted. It’s much worse for her under an Obama doctrine. She’s not going to grow up to be Condi Rice and have a brilliant mind and great education and all of the opportunity in the world, because she cannot overcome the school vouchers that are not offered in her home city of Wash. DC.


  7. Navin R Johnson on 3/03/12 at 11:21 am

    Alec – I stole your awesome reply and posted it @ AOS. Hope that was OK.

  8. sean on 3/03/12 at 11:29 am

    under obama, julia will not be born, as her mother did not need to be burdened with a child

    also, there is a slide missing, the one where julia pays taxes?

  9. NateDogg614 on 3/03/12 at 11:32 am

    OK, I guess someone should say it…..

    Out of ALL OF THE POSSIBLE FEMALE NAMES they could have chosen, they HAD to go with the name of the main female character from Orwell’s 1984.

  10. ertdfg on 3/03/12 at 11:40 am

    Actually studies show going to school type settings before the age of 5 has a detrimental effect on educational behavior.

    If you try to start teaching kids before they’re old enough to start learning; they get used to failing, and being disappointed about not being able to do things, and hating school.

    Preschool is questionable; anything before that is on average a detriment.

  11. Hooray for Captain Spaulding on 3/03/12 at 3:06 pm

    Alec left me speechless.
    I’m stealing that.

    Jammie should publish this on the front page.

  12. kbdabear on 3/03/12 at 3:12 pm

    Best mocking comment on the #Julia hashtag;

    [i] “Frank J. Fleming ‏ @IMAO_

    At age 22, #Julia receives a visit to her home from President Obama. Later that day, she can’t locate her dog, Spot. ” [/i]

  13. rich b on 3/03/12 at 3:30 pm

    “fictional composite girlfriend”

    Isn’t this kind of like Omama’s fictional composite life?. You know, the “life” he kinda, sorta made up in his prelude to running for President. Anything sound familiar here?

    Once again, Joe Wilson is proven to be so profound in his simple statement from two years ago – “YOU LIE”

  14. the wolf on 3/03/12 at 7:29 pm

    I can simplify this. “Under Obama’s policies, the US experiences a complete fiscal collapse, resulting in complete societal collapse. Julia is killed during a street riot.”

  15. Gneissgirl on 6/06/12 at 10:18 pm

    @ Alec

    I’m not usually compelled to comment on much, but that was incredible.

    I had to copy that and print it as a rebuttal to those that tend to live in fantasy land.

    Well done.