Angry Moochelle Angry Over “Angry Black Woman” Stereotype

Posted by on Jan 11, 2012 at 8:25 am

Well, if she weren’t so damn angry all the time, she wouldn’t be angry over being “stereotyped” at being so angry.

First lady Michelle Obama is challenging assertions she’s forcefully imposed her will on White House aides, saying she’s tired of people portraying her as “some kind of angry black woman.”

Mrs. Obama tells CBS News she hasn’t read New York Times reporter Jodi Kantor’s new book that characterizes her as a behind-the-scenes force in the Executive Mansion, whose strong views often draw her into conflict with President Barack Obama’s top advisers.

“I never read these books,” she told CBS’s Gayle King in an interview broadcast Wednesday. “So I’ve just gotten in the habit of not reading other people’s impressions of people.”

So if she hasn’t read the book, how come the White House is sending this angry woman out to refute the allegations in it?

Let’s face it: Everyone knows this is a spoiled, perpetually pissed-off woman with a non-stop scowl on her mug. She hasn’t been dubbed the Tower of Glower for nothing. But look out or she’ll kick your ass.

And how this for a face of sincerity?



21 Responses to “Angry Moochelle Angry Over “Angry Black Woman” Stereotype”

  1. Brendon Carr on 11/11/12 at 8:59 am

    Swear to God, her anger is like a self-licking ice cream cone. She’s angry because people noticed she’s angry all the time? You’d think $30 million worth of taxpayer-funded vacations, plus the high life in the White House would take some of the edge off.

  2. dookh on 11/11/12 at 9:57 am

    You think she’s angry now, wait till the republican nominee is chosen and he’s 10 points ahead of his excellency in the polls from then on. Then wait till the Messiah is kicked to the curb next Nov. Then wait until the next president starts undoing everything the Messiah did.
    But don’t call her angry, she might fly into a rage and beat you up……

  3. NotOnMyDime on 11/11/12 at 2:08 pm

    It kills me to know I’ve paid my taxes after working hard my whole life, (unlike the Obamas) so these entitled carpet baggers can live like royalty, and still whine.
    Her ANGRY grimmaces are such a turn off.
    There’s no way Barry wakes up in the morning, looks at M,
    and doesn’t recoil like Curly Howard seeing a monster.

    What a long step down from Laura Bush’s class.

  4. the wolf on 11/11/12 at 5:12 pm

    I was just attempting to read her thesis at Princeton. So far it sounds like a lengthy cry for help rather than a thesis:

    “My experiences at Princetonhave made me far more aware of my “Blackness”
    than ever before. I have found that at Princeton no matter how liberal and open-minded some of myWhite professors and classmates try to be towardme, I sometimes feel like a visitor on campus;as if I really don’t belong. Regardless of the circumstances underwhich I interact with Whitesat Princeton, it often seems as if, to them, Iwill always be Black first and a student second.These experiences have made it apparent to methat the path I have chosen to follow byattending Princeton will likely lead to myfurther integration and/or assimilation into aWhite cultural and social structure that willonly allow me to remain on the periphery ofsociety; never becom3ing a full participant. This realization has presently, made my goals to actively utilize myresources to benefit the Black community more desirable.”

  5. Ronchris on 11/11/12 at 6:39 pm

    It’s not the glowering look that scares me most about her.

    It’s those John Wayne Gacy in clown make-up eyebrows…

  6. Arthur Bishop on 11/11/12 at 6:43 pm

    Wonder why the media never asks the “harvard trained lawyer” why she surrendered her law license?

  7. chris on 12/12/12 at 6:07 pm

    Since when has “Angry Black Women” been a stereotype?

    This stereotype simply hasn’t been part of our culture…ever.

    The stereotype, use ad nauseum, is “Angry White Men” The MFM is so lame they can not even do a simple google search and see the idiocy of this parasite’s rantings.

    If you ran this woman’s thesis through one of those “grade level of writing” checks, it wouldn’t pass fourth grade. Please recall how they did this “checking with Bush only to discover that while most his speeches graded at about ninth grade, this is typical for anyone speaking to large, diverse audience of US citizens.

  8. Tea Party at Perrysburg on 12/12/12 at 7:06 pm

    I read a 2008 Daily Mail article that talked about her Princeton thesis, currently held in protective custody. It was described as being written in an “angry brand” of politics.

    The descriptor “angry” is used several times in the article.

    Man, I’d love to see that thang.

  9. LSBeene on 14/14/12 at 4:52 am

    Michelle Obama has acted like she feels like an ENTITLED person. Her mechanism and vehicle may be race and or gender, but the shoe fits.

    If you look at the history of Michelle Obama it’s of interest to note that after graduating law school she went to work for a Law Firm in 1988. She left in 1991. Let that sink in for a minute.

    Most young associates who go to work for a law firm realize that the first 2-3 years are pure drudgery and the next few 1-5 years are for building your reputation in your chosen specialization. Your first year you are doing scut work and preparing to pass the bar.

    You’re not even a lawyer for most of your first year. THEN you have to LEARN how to PRACTICE law – because, despite Hollywood movies to the contrary, law school is theory, precedent, and a money sucking vacuum that is in serious need of overhaul.

    Apparently during her first or second year (this is from memory) she commented that there were few black faces and not enough black partners in the firm. She was barely beyond her J.D., had just passed the bar, and was broadly hinting (IMO) that they needed to “get this train moving” and do some affirmative action.

    Now, that’s MY TAKE on it – but I have grown up knowing quite a few lawyers, and can say this: Any first or second year associate who starts to make noises about how they SHOULD be moved up, (hint: you guys have a racial issue and need to promote minorities : meaning ME) is not going to do well.

    Law firms who take Harvard Law grads are making an investment. They are not going to see any real production out of them until year 3 or 4. There are exceptions, but it’s really rare. If you hire some associate and they can’t make the cut, they usually “seek employment elsewhere” – but it’s just polite lawyer speak for saying “the reality did not match the potential promise”.

    For a law firm to hire a Harvard Law grad, keep her and pay her, while she studies for the bar, and then her go, if she is some legal stud (or studdette) after 3 years is idiotic. They just gave that associate a crash course in law and are getting no return on their investment.

    But, Michelle stayed there for 3 years, and the firm and she parted ways. She then went into “public service” as “an assistant to the mayor”. 28 years old, barely able to practice and she’s advising the mayor?

    On what?!

    That’s not some red hot legal stud who blazed a trail – IMO that’s someone who found out the law firm world of grind and dues was actual WORK. Who then started to make noise about “not enough black faces at the partners table” and, think about this for a good minute or two, let Michelle know her future there wasn’t bright. A racially motivated black lawyer who had serious affirmative action issues – and they let her go – it was a gamble of pay now or risk a lot more later.

    Now – again, to be clear, much of this is based on my knowledge of how some law firms work, what it takes to make it the first few years out of law school, and the mutually beneficial relationship between associate and firm that exists – and how Michelle basically washed out.

    And then went into “public service” – and whose private sector work included farming out poor folk to local clinics instead of having the hospital she worked for see them (and pay for them) and being given a raise for saving the hospital money.

    Screw her politics, or who her husband is, or if she has a (D) or an (R) next to her name. IMO she’s an entitlement junkie who used gender and race to achieve what she lacks in talent. Doing that for herself if one thing. Doing it while “believing in ‘social justice’ and ‘helping people of color’” and then throwing those very people under the bus medically is pure self-absorbed mercenary behavior.

    She’s a phoney.

  10. Jerk-u-lees on 14/14/12 at 5:20 pm

    So the harridan is finally getting some grief for being, well, a harridan? You know, for the first time in my adult life, I am proud of my country.

    Or maybe it was the first time since lunch. Tough to tell. At any rate–Michelle, life sucks, deal with it.

  11. SpideyTerry on 15/15/12 at 8:47 pm

    Y’know, some women are beautiful when they’re angry. Of course, there’s always an exception to every rule…

  12. Rose on 16/16/12 at 2:19 am

    Amazing to watch her online photo file change over the years, in ways no other celebrity has ever been able to accomplish. At the end of ’09, there were two profiles of Michelle – the pre-campaign photos and the post inauguration photos. Night and Day. Like the story they tell of the Last Supper where they claim the man used for the portrait of Judas claims that he was the same model for Jesus, with jail time for crimes occurring between modeling jobs. Or the Portrait of Dorian Gray.
    Then came the French President’s wife’s book in August/Sept 2010 – inside 4 DAYS the files were stripped of 95% of the angry photos of Michelle.

    NOW when THIS story broke, a new cleanse had already been done, and not only the angry photos are freshly removed, but all the gawdy clothing is gone, as well. Even new photos of her disembarking the Air Force One, in neat attractive clothing.

    It’s a caution, I tell you.